Why is the SNP government facing £170m court case over recycling scheme?

The political fallout from the Scottish government’s beleaguered bottle return scheme has been considerable, but the legal fallout could be equally as significant.

A waste management firm is suing the Scottish government for almost £170m over the collapse of the plans.

The Court of Session in Edinburgh has been told Scottish ministers were negligent when they claimed the scheme was viable.

But lawyers for the government say the company was aware of the risks involved and the claim should be dismissed.

The scheme, already postponed, was supposed to launch in August 2023. A matter of weeks before then, it was pushed back to at least October 2025.

That came following a dispute with the UK government, which refused to grant the scheme the go-ahead unless it conformed to a UK-wide approach excluding glass.

The firm that was due to manage the scheme, Circularity Scotland, collapsed. A non-profit company funded by the drinks industry, it folded with debts and liabilities of more than £86m.

One of its main creditors, Biffa Waste Services, is now suing the Scottish government.

The firm – which was appointed to collect recycled containers – is seeking up to £166.2m of reparations. This includes about £115m in projected profits over a 10-year contract with Circularity Scotland.

The rest of the total is made up of about £50m Biffa said it spent in preparation for the scheme – including buying vehicles and specialist equipment, leasing vehicle depots, processing sites and taking on extra staff.

In court summons, Biffa argued it was given “clear assurances” from former Green minister Lorna Slater – who has since left government after the end of the SNP-Green power-sharing agreement – that the scheme would go ahead.

The firm cited a letter sent by Slater in May 2022 reinforcing the government’s commitment to the plans.

Biffa said it signed its contract with Circularity Scotland as a “direct” result, and in the belief that ministers had “taken all necessary steps” to ensure it would be deliverable.

However, the government said the assurances in the letter were neither “new nor unique”.

Its lawyers said Biffa was taking a commercial risk – and should have been aware of the legal challenges involved.

The first half of a two-day Court of Session debate was held on Tuesday. The next session is expected to be held on Friday, before a judge considers a ruling.

If Biffa is successful, that could leave a sizeable hole in the government’s finances.

Alternately, a victory for the government in the courts could leave a major employer out of pocket.

Deposit return schemes are used in many countries to encourage people to recycle drinks containers such as bottles and cans.

Under the government’s plans, a 20p deposit was be added to all single-use drinks containers made of PET plastic, metal or glass.

Consumers could reclaim the deposit by returning the container to retailers and hospitality premises that sell such single-use products to take away, or to specially-designed reverse vending machines.

In recent months, ministers around the UK have been working on a four-nations scheme – but this has been delayed by two years to October 2027.

Lorna Slater said she had no choice but to delay the deposit return scheme, accusing Conservative ministers at Westminster of sabotage.

A Scottish government review from March 2023 reported it was fraught with problems months before the UK government halted it.

In August, it was revealed that the publicly-owned Scottish Investment Bank made an £8m loss on Circularity Scotland.

SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn has cited the row over the scheme scheme among “self-inflicted wounds” suffered by his party in July’s general election campaign.

He told reporters at the SNP conference: “While the Scottish people were in the midst of a cost of living crisis, we were having an argument with the UK government about a bottle bank.”