-
Donald Trump Says He Stopped Trade War With France While President - 12 mins ago
-
Why is the Japanese yen hovering near three-month lows against the dollar - 15 mins ago
-
Are Jerry Jones’ fan tours a hurdle to a Cowboys Super Bowl? - 17 mins ago
-
Where were London's most famous 'lost' gardens? - 21 mins ago
-
Elon Musk Put on Legal Notice Over $1 Million Voter Giveaway: Attorney - 32 mins ago
-
stocks, news, data and earnings - 33 mins ago
-
India vs Germany Live Telecast Hockey Live Streaming: When And Where To Watch - 34 mins ago
-
What’s changed for the Lionesses since Euro 2022 final? - 38 mins ago
-
What led to Modi and Xi meeting and thaw in India and China ties - 40 mins ago
-
For years, she raised alarms about her apartment. When the city finally acted, she ended up homeless. - 48 mins ago
Sacked Berkshire cop sang homophobic version of Last Christmas
A police officer who sang a “clearly homophobic and offensive” version of Wham!’s Last Christmas to colleagues has been sacked.
Former PC Leon Cunningham worked for Thames Valley Police in Reading, Berkshire, from November 2010.
A panel found in a separate conversation with colleagues, he implied that being gay was “a choice” and referred to two female colleagues by an offensive term in a text message.
The panel concluded if the “well-respected and liked” officer was not sacked, it would “clearly undermine public trust and confidence in policing”.
Mr Cunningham admitted he replaced the lyrics to the Christmas classic in November 2022 as it was being played on a radio in a police office.
Some colleagues disputed his version of events, with one senior officer saying he mentioned the word “bum”.
A senior officer said he told Mr Cunningham to stop singing “homophobic songs”.
The panel also found he implied being gay was “a choice, rather than natural” in an earlier conversation with colleagues in April 2022.
He admitted using the offensive word in a text message, also in November 2022, but he said while the reference was “objectively offensive… he did not intend to imply anything negative or sexual when using the term”.
The panel said Mr Cunningham’s response to the allegations “failed to demonstrate any insight or reflections about his proven behaviour nor provide any reassurance” about what he had learned from the proceedings.
It found his conduct was “serious and clearly poses a potential risk of repetition to colleagues and members of the public with protected characteristics”.
Karimulla Akbar Khan, the panel’s chairman, said if Mr Cunningham had been left to serve as a police officer, it would have sent “the wrong message that such conduct will be tolerated” in the force.
The panel said Mr Cunningham should be added to the College of Policing’s barred list.
Source link