-
Randi Lyn Butner Shatters Pro Stock History With Immense Pro Stock Run - 9 mins ago
-
Boxxer hoping for better after rough Riyadh week - 11 mins ago
-
We showed we are together – Man Utd boss Ten Hag - 15 mins ago
-
76ers News: Paul George Gets Honest About Lingering Knee Injury - 23 mins ago
-
Inter Miami and Lionel Messi set to take part in the 2025 FIFA Club World Cup hosted in the U.S.A., per report - 25 mins ago
-
Police appeal after inmate absconds from HMP Sudbury - 28 mins ago
-
Russian Major Killed in Car Bomb Explosion - 39 mins ago
-
Francis Ngannou vs. Renan Ferreira fight prediction, odds, start time, undercard for PFL Battle of the Giants - 41 mins ago
-
One dead after ‘explosion’ and fire at Bedford house - 45 mins ago
-
Not all Latino leaders opt to leave Arizona’s mine country for L.A. - 56 mins ago
Dawn Sturgess’ life could have been saved by paramedics, inquiry told
Ambulance crews were carrying medication which could have saved Dawn Sturgess’ life, an independent inquiry into her death was told.
Ms Sturgess, 44, was inadvertently exposed to the deadly nerve agent Novichok in Amesbury in June 2018.
Medicine DuoDate, which is an antidote to nerve agent poisoning, had been introduced on all emergency vehicles the year prior to her death.
However, paramedics initially misdiagnosed the mother-of-three with opiate-poisoning due to an overlap of symptoms, including respiratory issues and fading consciousness.
By the time her partner Charlie Rowley become ill later that afternoon, paramedics raised concerns this could be nerve agent poisoning, but were effectively “overruled” by Wiltshire Police, the hearing was told.
Wayne Darch, who was head of emergency operations at the South Western Ambulance Service in 2018, told the inquiry “more could have been done” to train staff on “misdiagnosis awareness”.
It is understood the nerve agent had been hidden inside a designer perfume bottle, which Ms Sturgess’ partner unknowingly gave to her.
Lead counsel Andrew O’Connor KC told the inquiry she suffered from heart failure because of the Novichok poison.
In the end, he adds, the brain injury Ms Sturgess sustained from a lack of oxygen during the initial period was the “immediate cause” of her death.
The overriding question posed by Mr O’Connor at the inquiry is: “Was the poisoning of Dawn Sturgess preventable?”
Mr Darch told the inquiry that poisoning from organophosphates, a toxic chemical compound, can come from several sources including pesticides, fertiliser, and flammable retardants.
He added: “A number of our clinicians will go a whole career without witnessing or attending an organophosphate or nerve agent poisoning, whether accidental or deliberate.
“We responded to the symptoms that we believed were of an opiate overdose nature. It was some hours later that it became known this was not an opiate-related incident.
“My perspective is that at the time we did the best we could with what we had available to us.”
This misdiagnosis meant the DuoDate treatment was not administered, which could have prevented Ms Sturgess’ death, the inquiry heard.
Just four months prior to Ms Sturgess’ death, former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia Skripal had been poisoned with the same nerve agent, roughly eight miles away in Salisbury.
The pair had gone for lunch at a pub before they were both found collapsed “in a serious condition” on a shopping centre bench.
A report at the time stated ambulance staff had similarly misdiagnosed the pair, and the actual cause of their illness was not revealed until “15 hours later”.
Fortunately, both made a full recovery and are currently living under protection.
Michael Mansfield KC, representing the family of Dawn Sturgess, asked Mr Darch what provisions had been made to protect the public following this initial attack in March.
Local emergency workers appear not to have been warned to look out for the fact that symptoms between drug overdoses and nerve agent poisonings can be easily confused – meaning it was not on their immediate radar when Ms Sturgess fell ill.
Mr Mansfield also referenced an internal document sent by the Department of Health and Social Care ten days after the Salisbury poisonings, titled ‘Risk of Secondary Incident’.
It contained a list of the worst-case scenarios, one of which was deemed the ‘accidental discovery of a discarded agent’ elsewhere.
However, the letter was advised “not to be forwarded further than necessary”, and Mr Darch alleges he never saw it.
“One of the problems after the Salisbury attack was a mindset,” Mr Mansfield said.
“That’s because Novichok or nerve agent poisoning was rare or virtually unknown, that it wouldn’t happen again.”
Mr Darch said he was responding on the advice of Public Health experts at the time that the “risk was extremely low”.
BBC reporter Dan O’Brien has been following this morning’s session.
He said: “The big theme has been about communication – or perhaps the lack of it – between different organisations involved in the response to the Salisbury and Amesbury Novichok incidents.
“By the time Charlie had become ill later that afternoon, the paramedics raised concerns this could actually be a nerve agent – but were effectively “overruled” by Wiltshire Police.
“Police were then instructed to search Charlie’s flat – despite that warning from medics on the ground, and despite one of their own officers becoming critically unwell after searching the Skripal house four months earlier,” he added.
Source link