-
Lakers’ LeBron James Reverses Course on Retirement, Details Timeline - 11 mins ago
-
Burberry shares hit intraday high as overhaul strategy marks turning point - 13 mins ago
-
UFC 309 — Jon Jones vs. Stipe Miocic: Fight card, odds, start time, date, location, rumors, complete guide - 14 mins ago
-
Two people charged over Just Stop Oil protest at Stonehenge - 17 mins ago
-
LA28 boss says prep for the Olympics isn’t so different from war - 25 mins ago
-
New Mom-of-Three Left ‘Mortified’ by What She Mistakenly Wears Outside - 26 mins ago
-
I May l Die from This Cancer, And That’s Okay - 28 mins ago
-
NBA standings – Biggest surprises and underperformers of the 2024-25 season so far - 30 mins ago
-
Arrests after theft of rare mineral Blue John - 33 mins ago
-
Mets Land Projected $130 Million All-Star Ace in Five-Player Trade Proposal - 42 mins ago
Novichok poisonings sparked ‘incident of scale not seen’
The poisonings of a former Russian spy and his daughter with Novichok in Salisbury were a “truly unprecedented incident of a scale that we had not seen,” a top police officer has said.
Commander Dominic Murphy, head of the Metropolitan Police’s Counter Terrorism Command, said it was an “extremely sobering moment”.
Ex-spy Sergei Skripal, his daughter Yulia and then police officer Nick Bailey were poisoned in March 2018 but survived – before Dawn Sturgess, 44, died in July the same year after being exposed to the nerve agent.
Speaking at the inquiry into Ms Sturgess’ death, Mr Murphy said counter-terrorism police’s “dismissive” response to suggestions of a poisoning was “extremely disappointing”.
Mr Murphy said the officer who took the calls on the evening of 4 March 2018 had not “necessarily performed to the standard that we would have expected from all of our officers”.
An email from April 2021 from Wiltshire Police’s Insp Gill Hughes, previously shown to the inquiry, said special branch had been “very dismissive” of the information provided about Mr Skripal’s poisoning by the force’s control room.
Counsel to the inquiry Andrew O’Connor asked Mr Murphy on Tuesday: “If Inspector Hughes is right about the way in which her queries were responded to, would you agree that that is an inappropriate and unprofessional way to react to a query?”
Mr Murphy, who had also worked on the case of poisoned Russian defector Alexander Litvinenko, replied: “Yes. It’s extremely disappointing actually.”
Speaking about the level of media interest in the incident at the inquiry on Tuesday, Mr Murphy said: “Even with [the Litvinenko case] in mind, this was truly an unprecedented incident of a scale that we had not seen both in terms of the media interest and, even in the early hypothesis that this had been a state sponsored incident.”
Mr Murphy recalled sending police officers into scenes contaminated with Novichok.
“As you will no doubt hear, we were putting police officers in scenes that were contaminated with one of the most dangerous substances on the planet and that was a very substantial decision to be taking in a leadership sense.
“But also, those officers were all volunteers going into that work.”
The inquiry continues.
Source link